2964-6804 Formosa Journal of Science and Technology (FJST) 2964-6804 Formosa Journal of Science and Technology (FJST) 10.55927/fjst.v5i6.89 Priorities for Road Infrastructure Maintenance in a Case Study of Kepanjen Regency Roads Using SWOT Analysis and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) I Ketut Nagageni Ony Frengky Rumihin Iswandaru Widyatmoko 27 04 2026 29 05 2026 30 06 2026

Road pavement damage due to traffic loads can manifest in various forms, such as alligator cracking, longitudinal cracking, transverse cracking, potholes, rutting, and surface peeling. Therefore, prioritization is necessary for each road section within a single road maintenance program and activity. Addressing this challenge requires a comprehensive analytical approach to prioritize road infrastructure maintenance and improvement. The purpose of this study is to generate priority recommendations based on the analysis to support decision-making. The analysis found that the Blitar Regency-Kepanjen Highway Section is the first priority, followed by the Kepanjen-Gondanglegi Highway Section as the second priority, followed by the Wlingi City-Malang Regency Highway Section, and the Gondanglegi-Turen Highway Section as the last priority. It is also recommended that adjustments be made to the road maintenance priority criteria variables if this decision model is to be applied outside the Kepanjen Regency area and to deepen the comparative study regarding the reliability of the decision support system or software used in mapping the order of road preservation urgency.

AHP SWOT Infrastructure Road Maintenance
INTRODUCTION

Road infrastructure development is a key factor in supporting economic growth, public mobility, and the smooth distribution of goods and services. Roads serve as land transportation infrastructure connecting various centers of economic, social, and government activity. Therefore, good road pavement conditions are essential for optimal road service function. Premature pavement deterioration not only reduces the comfort and safety of road users but also has the potential to cause economic losses due to increased vehicle operating costs and road maintenance costs.

Land transportation, particularly roads, plays a crucial role in supporting global economic activity and mobility. Improving road stability continues to be a primary focus for many countries given its significant impact on economic growth and social development. According to the World Bank (2021), good road infrastructure can increase a country's GDP by 1-2% annually by facilitating access to markets, education, and healthcare. However, constraints such as limited funding and resources often hamper road maintenance and improvement efforts, particularly in developing countries.

Increased economic activity and urban growth have led to a continuous increase in traffic volume, particularly for heavy vehicles and freight transport. This situation is often not matched by adequate vehicle load control, resulting in many vehicles traveling with excessive loads. This excessive load places significant pressure on the pavement structure, particularly on the surface and base layers, ultimately accelerating structural and functional damage.

Pavement damage due to traffic loads can appear in various forms, such as alligator cracking, longitudinal cracks, transverse cracks, potholes, rutting, and surface peeling. This damage does not occur suddenly but is the result of the accumulation of repeated vehicle loads. The greater the load and the higher the frequency of heavy vehicle traffic, the greater the damage the pavement experiences.

In addition to vehicle load, traffic density also plays a significant role in accelerating road pavement degradation. Roads with high traffic volumes tend to deteriorate more rapidly than those with low traffic volumes. This condition is exacerbated when traffic is dominated by heavy vehicles, such as trucks and trailers, which have a much greater destructive force than light vehicles.

Key factors influencing road maintenance include budget constraints, geographic location, usage intensity, and climate conditions, all of which impact the rate of road degradation. Limited funding availability, for example, means that not all roads requiring repairs can be addressed simultaneously, necessitating effective prioritization.

Under budget constraints, prioritizing activities aimed at maintaining existing assets is a reasonable step. If financial conditions permit, asset enhancement is a second option. Only if substantial funds are available can new asset expansions be considered. This is a natural step in managing state assets, which constitute a significant amount of infrastructure, the performance of which will be the backbone of the national economy. Therefore, prioritization is necessary for each road section within a single program and road maintenance activity. If available funds only cover 25%, 50%, or 75% of the total road maintenance needs, it is necessary to determine which maintenance should be prioritized first.

The development of a road maintenance program essentially involves two factors: 1. Physical, geometric, and traffic conditions that indicate the need for maintenance in a given year (fiscal need). 2. Availability of funds that can be allocated for road maintenance in a given year (fiscal capacity). The gap between fiscal need and fiscal capacity makes it impossible to implement all programs simultaneously. Therefore, a prioritization mechanism is needed to determine the maintenance needs for each road section according to its level of importance.

The Wlingi Kepanjen Turen road section (52,860 km) is a vital route connecting Malang Regency with Blitar Regency. Therefore, its performance must be maintained. The Wlingi - Kepanjen - Turen road section can be divided into four sections: 1. Link 057 (Wlingi City - Malang Regency) (19,690 km), 2. Link 058 (Wlingi City Malang Regency) (19,690 km) Blitar Kepanjen: 17,040 km long, 3. Link 059: Kepanjen - Gondanglegi: 8,500 km long, 4. Link 060: Gondanglegi - Turen: 7,630 km long.

Therefore, a methodology is needed to prioritize road maintenance and improvements, which must be carried out evenly according to needs, as the government's funding capacity is very limited, ensuring that the objectives of the road service function are still met. To address this challenge, a comprehensive analytical approach is required to prioritize road infrastructure maintenance and improvements. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method (Thomas L. Saaty 1980) is used for multi-criteria decision-making by comparing alternatives based on hierarchical criteria such as road condition, traffic volume, and cost. Meanwhile, a SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) analysis provides a strategic perspective to identify internal strengths, weaknesses, external opportunities, and threats, thus supporting more holistic decision-making. The integration of AHP and SWOT allows for objective and strategic priority analysis.

METHODOLOGY

The research was conducted on the Wlingi - Kepanjen - Turen road section in Kepanjen Regency, East Java Province, which was selected as a case study due to its diverse road network (district and village) with hilly geographical challenges and high traffic volumes. Data analysis was conducted in two main stages: road condition analysis and the application of the AHP and SWOT methods.

Road Condition Analysis: Using IKJ data and parameters such as surface damage, structural strength, and drainage to describe road conditions in Kepanjen Regency.

SWOT Identification: Strengths Identification (Positive internal aspects such as human resources or available technology), Weaknesses Identification (Negative internal aspects such as budget constraints), Opportunities Identification (Positive external factors such as government support or investment), Threats Identification (Negative external factors such as natural disasters or climate change).

Using SWOT analysis to identify influential internal and external factors. Integration of AHP and SWOT: The SWOT identification results are used as the basis for prioritization in the AHP hierarchy formation. The analysis is performed using software such as Expert Choice for AHP and manual analysis for SWOT.

AHP Analysis: 1. Hierarchy formation (Objectives: maintenance priorities, criteria: SWOT, sub-criteria: most influential factors in SWOT). 2. Pairwise comparison (Using the Saaty scale 1-9 through an expert questionnaire to create a comparison matrix). 3. Weight calculation (Using the eigenvector method to calculate priority weights and check consistency with a consistency ratio CR < 0.1). 4. Priority synthesis (Combining weights to determine the best alternative).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The Wlingi-Kepanjen-Turen road section is a strategic component of the road network, connecting Blitar Regency and Malang Regency. This section serves as the main distribution route for economic activities, particularly in the trade, agriculture, and inter-regional transportation sectors. Administratively, this road section is divided into several segments: Link 057, Link 058, Link 059, and Link 060. Each segment has distinct characteristics, including length, road condition, and traffic density. These differences in characteristics result in varying maintenance requirements for each section. Therefore, a comprehensive analysis is required to prioritize road maintenance appropriately, effectively, and efficiently.

There are technical, logical, and managerial reasons why Road Condition is the highest priority, while the SWOT aspect is ranked lowest: a. Urgency of Direct Physical Impact (The physical condition of the road has a direct impact on road user safety and vehicle operating costs. Unaddressed physical damage will accelerate the rate of pavement structural degradation). b. Priority Scale in Conditions of Budget Constraints (According to the asset management theory by Tamin, under conditions of limited funding, infrastructure management policies must prioritize activities aimed at preserving existing assets). c. Macro Characteristics and Subjectivity of SWOT Criteria (The SWOT criterion's fourth ranking does not indicate that strategic aspects are unimportant, but rather due to the macro, long-term, and qualitative nature of the instrument). Based on the results of the AHP and SWOT calculations, a priority order for management was obtained. The road section with the highest score indicates a greater level of urgency for management compared to other sections.

Section Name Road Section Weight Data AHP Questionnaire Weight Bobot Priority Order
K1 K2 K3 K4 K1 K2 K3 K4
Wingi City Boundary – Malang Regency Boundary Section 0.33 0.22 0.22 0.25 0.14 0.25 0.24 0.09 0.180 3
Blitar Regency – Kepanjen Highway Section 0.33 0.22 0.33 0.13 0.14 0.25 0.24 0.09 0.195 1
Kepanjen – Gondanglegi Section 0.17 0.44 0.22 0.50 0.14 0.25 0.24 0.09 0.234 2
Gondanglegi – Turen Section 0.17 0.11 0.22 0.13 0.14 0.25 0.24 0.09 0.117 4
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

The analysis found that the Blitar Regency – Kepanjen Highway section was the first priority, followed by the Kepanjen – Gondanglegi Highway section as the second priority, followed by the Wlingi City – Malang Regency Highway section, and the Gondanglegi – Turen Highway section as the last priority. The recommendation is the need to make adjustments to the road maintenance priority criteria variables if this decision model is to be applied outside the Kepanjen Regency area and to develop and deepen comparative studies related to the reliability of the decision support system or software used in mapping the order of road preservation urgency.

AbdullahS. ZamriN. 2023 Combined AHP and SWOT for prioritizing road maintenance in Indonesian districts Journal of Infrastructure and Transportation Management 5 1 45 60 AhmadA. AzikinA. AgustanA. NasrulN. MinmahddunM. 2024 Impact of heavy vehicle traffic density on road pavement degradation Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering 12 3 110 125 DewiR. Road stability and its impact on national economic growth Ministry of Public Works and Public Housing FirdausyiA. TjendaniH. WidyatmokoD. 2026 Analysis of traffic load and risk of road damage on the Sumengko–Bandungrejo section due to the construction of a bioethanol plant National Civil Engineering Journal 14 1 23 38 GhonniyuM. 2024 Prioritizing road maintenance under budget constraints: A multi-criteria approach Journal of Infrastructure Management 9 2 88 102 HidayatR. SudarsoA. 2024 An integrated analysis of the SWOT–Fuzzy AHP method for developing strategies to increase air transportation use at Trunojoyo Airport, Sumenep Journal of Transportation and Logistics 11 1 60 78 KadarismanM. GunawanA. IsmiyatiI. 2016 Land transportation management policies and their impact on the economy of the people in DKI Jakarta Journal of Transportation & Logistics Management 3 1 41 58 MerianaT. PrasetyantoD. 2023 Study of road infrastructure maintenance priorities in Bandung City based on the AHP method ITB Civil Engineering Journal 30 2 145 158 RahmanA. PrasetyoA. 2022 SWOT analysis for road infrastructure development in East Java International Journal of Civil Engineering and Infrastructure 4 2 33 47 RidwanM. SaprudinS. 2024 Key factors influencing road maintenance and management in Indonesia Journal of Infrastructure and Development 6 1 15 29 RumihinO. F. 2025 Analysis of infrastructure development supporting Asol water tourism in the Haruku Island area, Maluku: A planning and design approach using the AHP method Journal of Urban and Regional Planning 36 1 50 67 SaatyT. L. 1980 The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation McGraw-Hill SahbanH. SeA. 2018 Challenges of road infrastructure maintenance in developing countries: A literature review Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering 6 3 99 112 SeptianiR. 2020 Road infrastructure and economic growth: A review of the World Bank report Journal of Development Economics 18 2 75 89 SiahayY. RumbiakM. WattimenaA. 2023 Premature road pavement deterioration and its impact on vehicle operating costs Journal of Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 5 2 44 58 SiregarR. WibowoA. 2021 Analysis of road conditions and maintenance priorities using AHP in Sleman Regency Journal of Infrastructure Asset & Facility Management 5 3 201 215 SitanggangB. MuliaT. NasutionA. 2022 Analysis of road maintenance priorities in Dairi Regency using AHP and GIS methods Journal of Civil Engineering, University of North Sumatra 10 2 67 84 SusheraD. RohmanM. A. KartikaA. A. G. 2018 Analysis of road maintenance priorities in Karanganyar Regency using the AHP method Journal of Civil Engineering 7 2 93 107 TaminO. Z. 2002 Transportation planning, modeling, and engineering: Theory, examples, and applications 2 ITB Publisher World Bank 2021 Connecting to thrive: Challenges and opportunities of transport for women in Sub-Saharan Africa The World Bank World Road Association 2019 Road maintenance costs and economic impacts PIARC YulianiE. 2020 Determining road infrastructure priorities using the AHP Expert Choice method (case study: Demak–Godong Road) Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture 25 1 38 50 YunusR. BasriH. WahidA. 2025 Traffic loads and road structural damage Indonesian Journal of Civil Engineering 18 2 56 70