Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Road Handling Priority Analysis for East Java Provincial Road Sections in Gresik Regency Drawing from the Provincial/District Road Management System (PKRMS)

Abstract

The AHP method used in this study was used. The AHP questionnaire instrument in this study was structured as a table of pairwise comparisons between criteria. Each criterion was compared with the others using a scale of 1 to 9. The PKRMS results without AHP integration indicate that section 112 is the first priority with a TPI of 83.7. Section 110 is the second priority with a TPI of 76.2. Section 111 is the third priority with a TPI of 24.5. Based on the MW value, section 110 has the highest cost requirement, at IDR 77,415.4 million. However, using the TPI as the basis for technical prioritization, section 112 remains the top priority. After the PKRMS-AHP integration, the technical priority order remains with section 112 as the first priority with a TPI of 24.9, followed by section 110 with a value of 22.5, and section 111 with a value of 7.5. However, in terms of five-year cost requirements, section 110 remains the section with the largest MW value, amounting to Rp57,742.9 million, followed by section 111 at Rp22,200.3 million, and section 112 at Rp9,005.9 million. As for the recommendations, determining priorities should not only be based on the amount of work costs required, but also pay attention to the TPI value, AHP criteria weight, road conditions, traffic volume, connectivity function, and the role of the road section in industrial and logistics areas