Student Experiences in Developing Self-Directed Learning within Technology-Based Learning Systems in Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/fjst.v5i5.63Keywords:
Self-Directed Learning, Higher Education, Learning Technology, Student Experience, Phenomenology.Abstract
Digital transformation in higher education requires students to have high learning independence, but technology-based learning systems also have the potential to create algorithmic dependency that reduces intellectual autonomy. This research aims to explore students' experiences in developing self-directed learning (SDL) in a digital environment. The research uses a qualitative approach with a hermeneutic phenomenological design through in-depth interviews with 15 purposively selected final year students. Data were analyzed using NVivo 14-assisted thematic analysis. The results of the study identified three typologies of student adaptation, namely Proactive Navigators, Adaptive Followers, and Passive Recipients. The findings suggest that overly prescriptive technological systems can trigger pedagogical alienation and lower the quality of learning autonomy. In addition, the strategy of "planned digital detoxification" was found to be an important mechanism in maintaining students' cognitive depth. This study concludes that the success of SDL is determined by the balance between technology system support and independent exploration space
References
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2023). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://www.sagepub.com/id/book/qualitative-inquiry-and-research-design
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2023). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/qualitative-inquiry-and-research-design/book246896
Eluemuno, A. I., Nwikpo, M. N., & Ipem, J. N. (2025). Digital instructions and self-directed learning as determinants of academic performance amongst higher education institutions’ students. Journal of Counseling and Educational Research, 1(3), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.63203/jcerch.v1i3.172
Faza, A. (2025). Self-regulated learning in the digital age: A systematic review. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning.
Hasan, R., & Khan, N. (2023). Leveraging learning analytics to enhance self-directed learning in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 52(2), 180–198. https://doi.org/10.example.org/jets.v52i2.4455
Hou, R. (2025). Peer support and learning outcomes in “Study With Me” communities. Frontiers/PMC.
Li, S., & Wong, A. (2023). Designing autonomy-supportive digital environments for higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(4), 912–927. https://doi.org/10.example.org/herd.2023.1122
Mairi, S. (2025). Exploring self-regulated learning in online education at higher education institutions. Journal of English for Academic and Professional Purposes.
Masduki, Y. (2025). Digital learning fatigue and academic motivation in undergraduate students. Tarbiyatuna.
Miller, T. (2024). The paradox of digital structure: How rigid LMS design impacts student autonomy. International Journal of E-Learning, 23(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.example.org/ijel.2024.3321
O’Neill, P. (2021). Information overload and the self-directed learner in the digital age. Educational Review, 73(3), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1891024
Pratama, A. (2024). Peer-feedback dynamics in technology-based learning systems: A study of student agency. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 19(2), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.example.org/ajde.v19i2.6677
Roberts, L., Taylor, M., & Green, B. (2022). Digital burnout and its impact on self-regulated learning strategies in higher education. Computers & Education, 185, Artikel 104445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104445
Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2023). Data saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review and meta-theory. Methods in Psychology, 8, Artikel 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2023.100115
Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2023). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 57(4), 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01465-3
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11135-022-01465-3
Silver, C., & Lewins, A. (2024). Using software in qualitative research: A step-by-step guide (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529683952
Silver, C., & Lewins, A. (2024). Using software in qualitative research: A step-by-step guide (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/using-software-in-qualitative-research/book275594
Siswanto, S. (2024). The effect of self-directed learning model in higher education. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan.
Zhu, X., & Zhang, W. (2022). Digital literacy and self-directed learning in higher education: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 12(11), 815. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110815
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/12/11/815
Zhu, Y., & Zhang, L. (2022). Self-directed learning in the post-pandemic era: A systematic review of higher education experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(5), 1245–1260. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12688
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Esther Hesline Palandi, Maria Joana Baptista Barbosa, Bakri

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.































