Epistemic Responsibility and Digital Information Ethics in Contemporary Quranic Interpretation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/fjst.v5i3.22Keywords:
Quranic Interpretation, Epistemic Responsibility, Digital Information Ethics, Digital Religion, Tafsir Methodology.Abstract
The development of digital technology has expanded access to the interpretation of the Qur'an through various online platforms. Although it provides opportunities for the dissemination of Islamic knowledge, this condition also poses challenges related to the validity of sources, scientific authority, and ethics in the dissemination of religious information. This research aims to analyze the role of epistemic responsibility and digital information ethics in the contemporary interpretation of the Qur'an. The research uses a qualitative approach through literature analysis on the study of interpretation, epistemology, and ethics of digital information. The results show that digital transformation expands participation in interpretation production, but also increases the risk of non-methodological interpretations. Therefore, the integration of classical interpretation principles with digital information ethics is necessary to maintain scientific integrity and responsibility in the interpretation of the Qur'an in the digital age
References
Al-Dhahabī, M. H. (2018). Al-tafsīr wa al-mufassirūn. Cairo, Egypt: Dār al-Ḥadīth.
Al-Qattān, M. (2019). Mabāḥith fī ‘ulūm al-Qur’ān. Beirut, Lebanon: Mu’assasat al-Risālah.
Al-Qurṭubī, A. A. (2006). Al-jāmi‘ li aḥkām al-Qur’ān. Cairo, Egypt: Dār al-Kutub al-Miṣriyyah.
Al-Rāzī, F. (2000). Mafātīḥ al-ghayb (Tafsīr al-kabīr). Beirut, Lebanon: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabī.
Al-Suyūṭī, J. (2020). Al-itqān fī ‘ulūm al-Qur’ān. Beirut, Lebanon: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Al-Ṭabarī, M. J. (2001). Jāmi‘ al-bayān fī ta’wīl al-Qur’ān. Cairo, Egypt: Dār al-Ḥadīth.
Al-Zarkashī, B. (2019). Al-burhān fī ‘ulūm al-Qur’ān. Beirut, Lebanon: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Anderson, J. W. (2021). New media and the transformation of Muslim religious authority. Journal of Islamic Studies, 32(3), 405–421. https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/etab012
Battaly, H. (2022). Virtue epistemology and responsible belief. Oxford University Press.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage Publications.
Bunt, G. R. (2021). Hashtag Islam: How cyber-Islamic environments are transforming religious authority. University of North Carolina Press.
Bunt, G. R. (2022). Islam in the digital age: E-jihad, online fatwas and cyber Islamic environments. Pluto Press.
Campbell, H. A. (2021). Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in new media worlds. Routledge.
Campbell, H. A. (2022). Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in new media worlds (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Campbell, H. A., & Evolvi, G. (2020). Contextualizing current digital religion research on emerging technologies. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.149
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Eickelman, D. F. (2021). Religious authority and digital media in the Muslim world. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 53(2), 315–320. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020743821000302
Ess, C. (2020). Digital media ethics (3rd ed.). Polity Press.
Flick, U. (2022). An introduction to qualitative research (7th ed.). Sage Publications.
Floridi, L. (2021). The ethics of information. Oxford University Press.
Fricker, M. (2021). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.
Hart, C. (2018). Doing a literature review: Releasing the research imagination (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Hjarvard, S. (2022). The mediatization of religion: Theorising religion, media and social change. Routledge.
Hoover, S. M., & Echchaibi, N. (2021). Media theory and the “third spaces” of digital religion. Communication Theory, 31(2), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtaa019
Ibn Kathīr, I. (2000). Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-‘aẓīm. Beirut, Lebanon: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Jouili, J. (2021). Islamic knowledge production in the digital age. Contemporary Islam, 15(3), 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-021-00476-2
Kamali, M. H. (2021). Ethics and spirituality in Islam. Islamic Texts Society.
Larsson, G. (2020). Muslims and the new media: Historical and contemporary debates. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 40(2), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2020.1748323
Lynch, M. P. (2022). The internet of us: Knowing more and understanding less in the age of big data. Liveright Publishing.
Mandaville, P. (2020). Islam and politics (3rd ed.). Routledge.
March, A. F. (2021). Islamic ethics and the digital public sphere. Journal of Religious Ethics, 49(4), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/jore.12364
Medina, J. (2021). The epistemology of resistance. Oxford University Press.
Mustaqim, A. (2021). Metodologi tafsir kontemporer. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: LKiS.
Nasr, S. H. (2020). Islamic philosophy from its origin to the present. SUNY Press.
Saeed, A. (2020). Interpreting the Qur’an: Towards a contemporary approach. Routledge.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2022). Information disorder and the digital information ecosystem. Journal of Information Ethics, 31(1), 1–14.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Munawar Ahmad

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.































